Printer ink is more expensive than champagne Which is a study of consumer watchdog? Branded printer ink has been found to be “surprisingly” more expensive than third-party alternatives.
In some cases, champagne has been found to be the printer’s ink pricier.
Non-branded ink cartridges perform better or better than their branded alternatives.
Manufacturers are advising consumers not to use third-party ink, which is preventing some from doing so.
Outbreaks appear to be exacerbated during both homework and home schooling.
Printer ink is more expensive than champagne The survey surveyed 10,000 customers who owned inkjet printers, half of whom said they used their printers at least once a week.
It has conducted similar surveys in the past and concluded this year that the “branding cost difference” still remains between its own brand and third-party ink suppliers.
Image copy images
Image caption printer ink may need to be replaced several times per year
Ink purchased from the manufacturer can be up to 286% expensive
Multiply the cost of color ink for the Epson Workforce WF-7210 DTW printer £ 75.49 (or 3 3,369 per pint)
Ink for Brother MFCJ 577 DW is a multiplier £ 98.39 cost
Cartridges for a Canon Pixma MX475 cost.980.98
Ink purchased from this manufacturer can be 286% more expensive than third party ink
Cheaper options can be as cheap as £ 12.95, saving thousands over a five-year period
It also found that 26 HP printers now use a system called “dynamic protection” that recognizes cartridges that use non-HP chips and prevents them from working.
Other manufacturers promote ‘approved’, ‘original’ or ‘guaranteed’ cartridges on their websites and in the manual.
It confuses consumers, which one ?. 5 %% say they will only use branded ink, 39% avoid third party ink for fear that they will not work on their printer.
But at the same time people have given similar print quality ratings for original and third party inks, with 1 non-branded ink being released before Brother, Canon, Epson and HP.
Adam French, which one? Consumer rights expert, says: “The ink of the printer should not cost more than a bottle of high-end champagne or Channel 5.
“We’ve seen a lot of third party products exceed their branded parts in a fraction of the cost.”
He added that any ink that should be applied to the printer “should be a personal choice and should not be determined by the make of your printer”.
In response HP said that customers had the option to use HP Instant Ink, a subscription service that claimed that customers could save up to 0% of customers.
“HP gives customers the flexibility to use original HP cartridges or third-party cartridges that hold the original HP chip or circuitry,” it said.
Epson also highlighted models of its ecotank printer that said it brings enough ink to print for up to three years, with replacement bottles costing £ 7.99.
“Without designing or testing Epson-added genuine inks, we cannot guarantee that these abusers will not damage the printer,” it added.
The brother said its own brand of inks was a “high quality” but customers would not use them or have the option of a non-branded alternative.
And Canon said that while third-party inks can work with its printers, “internal technology is designed to work properly with our original inks.”